Single Shot Spinal Analgesia for Labour: Bupivacaine- Pethidine versusBupivacaine-Fentanyl for Multiparous women
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: The high cost of epidural services may impede its wholesale application especially in low resource setting. Single shot spinal, a cheap and effective alternative technique for alleviating labour pain, may be useful for Nigerian women in labour. Thus, we compared the effects of single-shot intrathecal bupivacaine with either fentanyl or pethidine (preservative-free) for labour analgesia in multiparous women.
Method: One hundred and twenty-two multiparous ASA 1 or 2 parturients at term requesting for analgesia in labour with cervical dilatation ≥ 4 cm were randomly assigned to receive 1.5ml of study solution containing 2.5mg hypobaric bupivacaine plus 7.5mg pethidine for BP group or 2.5mg hypobaric bupivacaine plus 25µg fentanyl for BF group. The spinal medications were administered aseptically into the subarachnoid space using any of L2/L3, L3/L4, or L4/L5 intervertebral space with the patient in sitting position. Primary outcome was the proportion of women who had adequate analgesia for labour in both groups.
Results: The patients had similar socio-demographic characteristics and baseline haemodynamic parameters. The mean onset time of spinal analgesia was shorter with BF group than the BP group (2.4 ± 0.7 min vs. 2.9 ± 1.0 min, p=0.006). All parturients achieved satisfactory analgesia with Numerical rating scale (NRS) ≤ 3 within 20 mins of institution of spinal block. The mean duration of analgesia was significantly longer in the BP group compared to the BF group (258 ± 76.2 min vs. 135.3 ± 3.4 min, p<0.001). The proportion of women in BP group that had adequate labour analgesia was 70.5% (43/61) as against 49.2% (30/61) in the BF group (p=0.026). Fewer number of women in the BP group (20/61) compared to the BF group (36/61) required additional analgesia for episiotomy repair.
Conclusion: The combination of bupivacaine-pethidine provided superior, long lasting, effective analgesia in multiparous women with good feto-maternal outcome. Pethidine added to bupivacaine should be preferred option for single shot spinal analgesia for multiparous women in labour especially in low resource countries of the world.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
1. Onah HE, Obi SN,Oguanuo, Ezike HA,Ogbuokiri CM, Ezugworie JO. Pain Perception among Parturients in Enugu, South- Eastern Nigeria. J ObstetGynecol 2007 Aug; 6:585-588.
2. Imarengiaye C O. Trends in pain relief in labour: implications for obstetric analgesic service in Nigeria. The Nig Postgraduate Med J.2005; 12(3):193-202.
3. Olofsson CH, Ekblom A, Ekman-Ordebarg G, Hjelm A, Irestedt L. Lack of analgesic effect of systemically administered morphine or pethidine on labour pain. Br J ObstetGynaecol 1996 Oct; 103(10):968-972.
4. Krzystof M, Kuczkowski,SusiloChandr. Maternal satisfaction with single dose spinal analgesia for labor pain in Indonesia: a landmark study. J Anesth 2008; 22:55-58.
5. Fynface–Ogan S, GogoJob O, Enyindah CE. Comparative effects of single shot bupivacaine Dexmedetomidine and Bupivacaine and fentanyl on labor outcome. Anesthesiology.2012:1-6.
6. Viitanen H, Viitanen M, Heikkila M. Single shot spinal block for labor analgesia in multiparous parturients. Acta Anaesthesia Scand 2005; 49:1023-1029.
7. Otokwala JG,Fyneface-ogan S, Mato CN. Comparative effects of single shot low dose spinal bupivacaine only and bupivacaine with fentanyl on labour outcome. Niger J. Med. 2013 Oct-Dec; 22(4):279-285.
8. Eriksson SL,Blomberg I, Olofsson C. Single shot intrathecal sufentanil with bupivacaine in late labour- analgesic quality and obstetric outcome. Eur . J. ObstetGynecolReprodBiol 2003 Oct; 110(2):131-5.
9. NganKee WD. Intrathecal pethidine: pharmacology and clinical applications. AnaestheIntens Care 1998; 26:137-146.
10. Roz Ullman, Lesley Smith A,Ethel Burns,Rinttaro Mori, Theresa Dowswell. Parenteral opioids for maternal pain management in labor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.Pmc 2014.
11. Imarengiaye CO, Asudo FD,Akpoduado DD,Akhideno II,Omoiefo CE,Ogunsakin A T. Subarachinoidbupivacaine and Pethidine for Cesarean section: Assessment of quality of prioperative analgesia and side effects. The Nig. Postgraduate Med.J.2011; 18(3):200-4.
12. WHO Recommendation for the active management of the third stage of labour. WHO, Geneva. 2012
13. Tarek A, Elshalakany NA, Shafik YM. Single dose spinal analgesia: Is it a good alternative to epidural to epidural analgesia in controlling labour pain? Egypt J of Anaesth.2014; 30(3):241-246.
14. Leslie NG. Intrathecal narcotics for labour analgesia: the poor man’s epidural. Can J Rural Med 2000; 5(4): 224 – 229
15. Helmi M, Uyun Y, Suwondo BS, Widodo U. Comparison of intrathecal use of isobaric and hyperbaric bupivacaine during lower abdominal surgery. J of Anaesth. Dec.2014:1-4
16. Gurmukh DP, Gauhar A. Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: plain vs hyperbaric bupivacaine. J Pak Med Assoc.2012; 8:807-811.
17. Honnet JE,Arkoosh VA, Norris MC, Huffnagle HJ, Silverman NS, Leighton BL. Comparison among intrathecal fentanyl,meperidine, and sufentanil for labor analgesia. AnesthAnalg 1992; 75:734-739.
18. Anabah T, Olufolabi A, Boyd J, George R. Low dose spinal anaesthesia provides effective labour analgesia and does not limit ambulation. South Afr J AnaesthAnalg 2015; 21(1):19-22.
19. Viscomi CM, Rathmel JP, Pace NL. Duration of intrathecal labour analgesia: early versus advanced labour. Anesth Analg.1997; 84:1108-1112.
20. Junttile EK, Karjalainen PK, Ohtonen PP, Raudaskoski TH, Ranta PO. A comparison of paracervical block with single shot spinal for labour analgesia in multiparous women: a randomized control trial. Int J of ObstetAnaesth 2009; 18:15-21.
21. MathurP,Jain N, Prajapet L, Jain K, GargD,Khandelwai V. Effect of intrathecal labor analgesia using 25µg and bupivacaine 2.5mg on progress of labour. J ObstetAnaesthCrit Care. 2017;7:47-51
22. Palmer CM, Van MG, Nogemi WM, Alves D. Bupivacaine augment intrathecal fentanyl for labour analgesia. Anesthesiology. 1999; 91:84-89.
23. Parlow J L, Money P, Chan P S, Raymond J, Miline B. Addition of opioids alters the density and spread of intrathecal local anaesthetics? An in vitro study. Can J Anesth. 1999; 46:66-70.
24. Gamlin FM, Lyons G. Spinal analgesia in labour. Int J ObstetAnaesth. 1979;6:161-172
25. Minty RN, Kelly L, Minty A, Hammett DC. Single-dose intrathecal analgesia to control labour pain: is it a useful alternative to epidural analgesia? Can Fam. Physician 2007; 53(3):437-442.
26. Shinider SM, Abboud TK, Artal R, Henriksen EH, Stefani SJ, Levinson G. Maternal catecholamines decreases during labour after lumber epidural anaesthesia. Am J Obstet Gynecol.1983.Sept.1; 147 (1):13-15.
27. Sunanda Gupta, Anand Kumar GS,HemeshSinghal. Acute Pain – labour analgesia. Indian J Anesthe. 2006;50(5):363-369
28. Anim-Somuah M, Smyth R, Howell C. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005:4:CD000331.
29. Cambic CR, Wong C. Labour analgesia and obstetric outcome. Br J Aaesth. 2010 ;105 (S1) : 50-60
30. Alavi MH, Rad ZT, Dadger SR. Assessment of effects of increased intravenous hydration on the course of labour in nulliparous term pregnancies. MJIRI 2005; 18(4):289-292.
31. Dawood F, Quenby S. Intravenous fluids for preventing dehydration and prolonged labour in nulliparous women.Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013:6:CD0007715.
32. Barbara L, Leighton MD, Stephen H, Halpern MD. The effects of epidural analgesia on labour, maternal, and neonatal outcomes: A systemic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 185(5): 69-77.
33. Bonita R, Beaglehole R, Kjellstrom T. Basic Epidemiology. 2ndEd.WHO,Geneva 206:81